Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, having an 88.3 score against 81.3. Galaxy S10's design is newer and just a little lighter than LG V35 ThinQ's, although it's also a little thicker. LG V35 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy S10 feature extremely similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a bit sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a little larger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a quite greater pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S10 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lower video resolution and a way less MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photos.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 has a bit longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 costs a little more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.