Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is much better than the LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. The Galaxy S20 body is newer, but just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the LG V35 ThinQ. The Galaxy S20 has a bit more vivid display than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy S20 has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy S20 counts with just a bit better performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has improved battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent more battery size. Galaxy S20 features a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images in low light environments and a way less mega pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.