Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a overall score of 90.8 against 81.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is extremely newer than the LG V35 ThinQ, it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy S20 FE and LG V35 ThinQ both count with extremely similar processors, they have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels, a worse video resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images, it also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S20 FE has longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.