Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than LG V35 ThinQ, with a 98 score against 81.3. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than the LG V35 ThinQ, it is thicker and extremely heavier. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 2880px, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better memory to store more apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a lot better video resolution and a way larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.