Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-01-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 has a general score of 91.8, which is better than LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. The Galaxy S21 construction is incredibly newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, although it is a little heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy S21 counts with a little more vivid display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little larger display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S21, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S21's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in LG V35 ThinQ, and although the Galaxy S21 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S21 has a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light images and video and a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a much larger camera sensor.
The Galaxy S21 counts with improved battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.