Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2022-01-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having an 89.1 score against 81.3. Galaxy S21 FE's construction is a lot newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, but it is a bit thicker and a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE's CPU is very similar to LG V35 ThinQ's CPU, both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better pixels count per display inch. The LG V35 ThinQ takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 36% larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, else you can save some money and get the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.