Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is much better than the LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a lot newer than LG V35 ThinQ, it is a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Galaxy S22, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Galaxy S22 takes greater photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a way larger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
LG V35 ThinQ has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 12% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S22, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.