Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-08 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S24 FE's 76 global score. LG V35 ThinQ is a noticeably lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than Galaxy S24 FE. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior CPU than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
Galaxy S24 FE has just a bit better display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a lot lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little larger display. LG V35 ThinQ features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a way worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.