Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-08 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a score of 82.6 against 81.3. Galaxy S25 is a a lot thinner and a lot lighter cellphone than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy S25 has a brighter screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a quite bigger display. LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S25 takes much better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy S25 counts with better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S25, else you can save some dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.