Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S7's 79.5 global score. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy S7, it's just a bit thinner and noticeably newer. Galaxy S7 counts with a bit sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater display density.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. LG V35 ThinQ takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a way higher 16 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S7. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S7, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.