Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with an 81.3 score against 75.8. The LG V35 ThinQ is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and way thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a bit sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel amount in each inch of screen. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and a much higher 16 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S7 Active features superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than the Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.