Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-08 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S7 edge's 78.1 global score. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is incredibly newer and a little bit thinner than Galaxy S7 edge's, but it is also just a bit heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a just a bit greater pixel number per inch in the display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores.
LG V35 ThinQ takes just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 16 megapixels resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
The Galaxy S7 edge features just a bit longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.