Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-04-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's overall score of 81.3. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy S8 is older and a bit thicker than the LG V35 ThinQ, it's construction is still a bit lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S8 features a bit sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a bit greater number of pixels in each inch of screen. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S8, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy S8, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S8 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.