Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with an 83.3 score against 81.3. Even though Galaxy S9 is better than the LG V35 ThinQ, it must be noted that it's also a just a little bit heavier and thicker device. The Galaxy S9 has just a bit better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels number per display inch and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S9, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S9 captures slightly better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video and a larger camera sensor taking better quality pictures.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.