Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with an 88.5 score against 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a newer and just a bit thinner device than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it is also heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880. The Galaxy Z Flip shoots slightly better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a way worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V35 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip's battery performance is very similar to the battery performance in LG V35 ThinQ.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.