Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than LG V35 ThinQ, with a 94.6 score against 81.3. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and a little thinner cellphone than the LG V35 ThinQ, although it is extremely heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a greater pixel number per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit faster CPU than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations and a back camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs.
LG V35 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has greater battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.