Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-08 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 overall score. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a thinner but noticeably heavier cellphone than the LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ features a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has much less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a way bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1968 x 2184. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a superior memory for apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition captures much better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a way more mega pixels camera.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.