Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-04-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a overall score of 81.3 against 79. Even when the LG V35 ThinQ and the Xperia XZ2 Compact were released only 2 months apart, the LG V35 ThinQ is much thinner and a little lighter. The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, a little bit lower pixel density and a little smaller display.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact takes a bit better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with higher video frame rates, a more MP camera in the back and a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 15 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.