Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-07-30 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with an 82.2 score against 81.3. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium's design is notably thicker and much heavier than the LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ and Xperia XZ2 Premium both count with extremely similar processing units, both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 2160 x 3840 pixels resolution and a better display density. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium shoots clearer photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a better 19 MP resolution camera in the back and a way larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has just a bit longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3540mAh of battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.