Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-04-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Xperia XZs's global score of 77.2. LG V35 ThinQ's body is newer, a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than Xperia XZs. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better screen than Xperia XZs, because it has a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch, a bigger display and a way better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Xperia XZs takes way better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xperia XZs also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and videos, faster 960 fps video frame rates and a camera in the back with more mega pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xperia XZs, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit longer battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.