Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2015-06-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Xperia Z4v's score of 78.8. LG V35 ThinQ is a a lot newer phone, and it's also thinner and just a bit lighter than Xperia Z4v. Xperia Z4v features a better screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density.
LG V35 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia Z4v, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger amount of RAM.
The Xperia Z4v takes a little bit better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 20.7 MP resolution and a much bigger camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a little bit longer battery life than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 10% larger battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than Xperia Z4v, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.