Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting an 82.9 score against 81.3. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is a newer cellphone than the LG V35 ThinQ, although it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution. LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.