Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-05-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a global score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is newer than the LG V35 ThinQ, it's way heavier and incredibly thicker. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a bit better processing power than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a little more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a much worse pixels density and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photos or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and better 60 fps video frame rates.
LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with improved battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Xiaomi Black Shark 4, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.