Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-07-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi A3, with an 81.3 score against 79.2. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Mi A3, but it's somewhat thinner and a little lighter anyway. LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a much greater count of pixels per inch of screen. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a much bigger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 features longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4030mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.