Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-08 | 2016-11-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, with a overall score of 81.3 against 76. The LG V35 ThinQ design is newer, just a little thinner and just a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2. The LG V35 ThinQ features a better screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a quite bigger display, a greater pixel number per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 4 more cpu cores.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4070mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a smaller sensor capturing worse quality images and videos, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.