Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2023-05-09 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's 79.5 overall score. The LG V35 ThinQ is an notably older phone than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, but LG managed to make it incredibly lighter and thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior processing power than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a much better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little larger screen. LG V35 ThinQ has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in low light environments. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.