Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a general score of 81.6, which is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 general score. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a a lot newer cellphone than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it's extremely heavier and a lot thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a better count of pixels per inch in the screen. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a lot better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.