Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, getting an 81.3 score against 78.3. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is notably older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, it's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a bit more vivid display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density and a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display. LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a back camera with a much lower 16 mega-pixels resolution and a much tinier sensor giving a lot worse image quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a much longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.