Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having a global score of 81.3 against 78.2. The LG V35 ThinQ is an notably older device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but it is somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a slightly better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a quite lower pixel count in each display inch and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit larger display. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a much better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.