Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2024-01-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| Black and Gray | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting a general score of 83.1 against 81.3. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G construction is a lot newer and a lot lighter than LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's just a bit thicker. LG V35 ThinQ has a much better performing processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a little worse resolution of 1220 x 2710px, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a much larger sensor and a lot better resolution camera in the back. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a way better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.