Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's global score of 76.6. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a very superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG V35 ThinQ is also cheaper than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.