Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having an 81.3 score against 80.2. Although LG V35 ThinQ is older than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, it's body is a little thinner and lighter. LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a higher screen density.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a little bit better performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a superior storage to store more apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with improved battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images, and they both have the same video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and better 60 fps video frame rates.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.