Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-06-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, with a global score of 81.3 against 78.1. Despite of the fact that the LG V35 ThinQ is older than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, it's design is lighter and a little bit thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater pixel count in each inch in the screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's CPU is just as good as the LG V35 ThinQ one, and although the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a same size aperture, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a really longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 39% greater battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.