Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having a score of 88.1 against 81.2. The Apple iPhone X is a just a little bit heavier cellphone than the LG V40 ThinQ, but they have the same thickness. IPhone X counts with just a bit better performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has 2 less and slower cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone X features a bit better looking screen than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a lot lower 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution, a little smaller display and a just a bit lower display density. The LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates, a same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger aperture for better low-light images and a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos.
LG V40 ThinQ features a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ features superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 22% bigger battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V40 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V40 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.