Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is a little bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, having a overall score of 84.2 against 81.2. IPhone XS is a just a bit heavier cellphone than LG V40 ThinQ, but both are equally thin. The Apple iPhone XS has a little sharper display than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a much lower 1125 x 2436 resolution, a little bit lower count of pixels per inch of display and a bit smaller display.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The iPhone XS has a bit superior processing unit than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The LG V40 ThinQ shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and video.
LG V40 ThinQ has improved battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V40 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V40 ThinQ, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.