Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel's 80.2 overall score. The LG V40 ThinQ design is newer and somewhat thinner than Google Pixel's, but it is also somewhat heavier. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Google Pixel, because it has 4 more cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel, because it has a bigger display, a just a bit greater amount of pixels in each display inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG V40 ThinQ shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution, a smaller sensor providing a worse image quality and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
LG V40 ThinQ has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ has improved battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 19% bigger battery capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.