Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's score of 80. The LG V40 ThinQ construction is heavier but just a little thinner than Google Pixel 3, and both of them were released only a couple months apart. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a bigger screen and a just a bit higher amount of pixels in each display inch. The LG V40 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. LG V40 ThinQ takes clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and pictures, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a lesser megapixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Although LG V40 ThinQ is a better device, it costs more money than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 3, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.