Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having a score of 81.9 against 81.2. Even though the Google Pixel 4 is just a little thicker than LG V40 ThinQ, it's just a little bit lighter and newer. LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution, a bit bigger screen and a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 and LG V40 ThinQ both have really similar processing units, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality, a less megapixels resolution camera in the back and a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture. LG V40 ThinQ has longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V40 ThinQ, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.