Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting an 82.9 score against 81.2. The Google Pixel 4 XL body is newer than LG V40 ThinQ's, but it's heavier and a little thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL has a screen that is very similar to the screen in LG V40 ThinQ, although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a quite smaller display, a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a quite lower display density.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL's CPU is very similar to the LG V40 ThinQ one, both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 12% bigger battery size. LG V40 ThinQ captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low light situations.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V40 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V40 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.