Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is just a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, with a general score of 89 against 81.2. The Google Pixel 5 is a newer and somewhat lighter phone than LG V40 ThinQ, although it is also just a bit thicker. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 5, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a little bit greater display density and a bit larger screen. LG V40 ThinQ and Google Pixel 5 both count with really similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 5 has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a better resolution back-facing camera.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 5 has greater battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V40 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG V40 ThinQ, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.