Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than HTC One M9, getting a general score of 81.2 against 77.7. The LG V40 ThinQ construction is noticeably newer and incredibly thinner than HTC One M9's, although it's just a bit heavier. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, giving you some nice extra features.
HTC One M9 has a slightly better looking display than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a lot lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a way smaller screen and a bit lower screen pixel density. LG V40 ThinQ features a much better storage for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
HTC One M9 has a bit better CPU than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64 bits processing unit. The LG V40 ThinQ features better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than HTC One M9, because although it has a worse video quality, a smaller sensor and a back-facing camera with a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture.
LG V40 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than HTC One M9, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.