Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the LG K52's 76 score. These phones have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. Even though LG V40 ThinQ is noticeably older than the LG K52, it's design is a bit thinner and a little lighter.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little better processing power than LG K52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ features a much more vibrant display than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater display density and a much higher 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The LG K52's storage capacity for games and applications is just as good as LG V40 ThinQ's one, both of them have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity. LG V40 ThinQ shoots just a bit better videos and photos than LG K52, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera and a lot smaller sensor shooting lot lower quality videos and pictures, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
LG K52 features better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.