Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than the LG K62, with a score of 81.2 against 78.2. The LG V40 ThinQ design is a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the LG K62, although it was released 2 years before. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than LG K62, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V40 ThinQ features a much more vibrant display than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a lot higher display pixels density. The LG K62 features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K62 also has more internal memory capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG K62, because although it has a much smaller camera sensor and a way less MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and videos. The LG K62 counts with greater battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.