Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's general score of 81.2. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS, so they should provide you identical OS features. Although the LG K92 is way newer than the LG V40 ThinQ, it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than LG K92. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a greater pixel number per display inch.
The LG K92 takes better videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or videos in low light situations and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera and a much bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs.
The LG K92 has more memory capacity to install games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has more internal memory capacity. The LG K92 has improved battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V40 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V40 ThinQ, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.