Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than LG Q70's score of 77.9. These phones use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. The LG V40 ThinQ body is just a bit thinner and lighter than LG Q70, even though it was released a bit more more than a year before.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than LG Q70, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The LG Q70 counts with as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the LG V40 ThinQ one, both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 has just a bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and/or video in low-light situations and a smaller camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a much better resolution back camera.
The LG Q70 has better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 21% more battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.