Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting a 91.2 score against 81.2. The LG Wing body is newer, but notably thicker and a lot heavier than LG V40 ThinQ. Both of these devices have the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than LG Wing, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a higher pixels density.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than LG Wing, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The LG Wing shoots greater pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a back camera with way more megapixels.
LG Wing has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has more internal memory capacity. LG Wing features superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V40 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V40 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.