Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, with an 84.7 score against 81.2. Motorola Edge (2022)'s body is newer, but a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than LG V40 ThinQ. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge (2022) has 12 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, giving you a lot of extra features.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little better performance than Motorola Edge (2022). Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a better pixels density.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge (2022) has a better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a much better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V40 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the LG V40 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.