Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is a little bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 overall score. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro design is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than LG V40 ThinQ. These phones include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the newer 13 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it gives some nice extra features.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a display that is very similar to LG V40 ThinQ's display, because although the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a lot less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a much more MP back-facing camera and a lot better video definition. The LG V40 ThinQ features a greater storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.