Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 overall score. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction is newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, but it is just a little heavier and a little thicker. These phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a newer 14 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it provides you lots of additional features.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little more vivid display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a lot less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera, a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.