Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is slightly better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having an 86.2 score against 81.2. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G200 5G has newer 11 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version. Although Moto G200 5G is way newer than LG V40 ThinQ, it is somewhat heavier and thicker.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit faster processor than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a higher pixels number per inch in the display.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G200 5G has a much better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G200 5G features a better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a lot smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.